Error processing SSI file |
||||
Editor: Marc Bridle
Webmaster: Len Mullenger
|
Seen
and Heard Prom Review
PROM
38: Sheng
& Messiaen, The London Sinfonietta/David
Robertson, Royal Albert Hall, Friday 13 August
2004 (AN)
Bright SHENG The Song and
Dance of Tears (2003) *UK Première
Yo-Yo Ma (cello)
Wu Man (pipa)
Wu Tong (sheng)
Joel Fan (piano)
(interval)
Olivier MESSIAEN Turangalîla
Symphony (1946-8, rev.1990)
Paul Crossley (piano)
Cynthia Millar (ondes martenot)
If in doubt, go with your
instinct: an enduring piece of wisdom
that might have saved Bright Sheng’s ill-suited
cello, piano, pipa and sheng
quadruple concerto: "I can’t; it won’t
balance", insisted the composer when
Yo-Yo Ma first suggested an ensemble comprising
cello, piano and Chinese lute (pipa).
Sheng perceived that the soft-spoken pipa
would struggle to be heard, but the occasion
of the Silk Road experience and a commission
from one of the most highly regarded musicians
proved too strong a temptation.
The Silk Road project escorted
Sheng to his native China, where folk-music
investigations in several Western provinces
– including the Tibetan-bordering Qinghai
– uncovered an exciting wealth of ethnic diversity.
The Song of Dance and Tears is therefore
a celebration of cross-cultural differences,
and Sheng claims to have done this not through
direct translation of indigenous musical material
but through the far more popular and accessible
structures of the Western classical-music
medium. In the words of Robert Maycock’s programme
notes, ‘Sheng is a composer, not a preservationist.’
To redress the immediate
problem of balance, Sheng introduced his namesake
Chinese mouth organ (sheng) which,
unlike the pipa, would have no trouble
projecting. Following this, a standard slow-fast-slow
concerto (the movements entitled The Song,
The Dance and Tears respectively),
with each section indebted to specific folkloric
influences such as developed heterophony in
the first and Kazakh songs in the last.
A recipe for ideological
success, perhaps, but musically undesirable.
The instrumental makeup posed the harshest
inconsistency, and was never more offensive
than during The Song where tremendous
performances all round could not mitigate
the comical disparity between soloists and
orchestra.
The grandiose orchestral
introduction promised great things, but measly
solo entries soon after made a mockery of
it. Yo-Yo Ma’s high-pitched cello lead was
ridiculed by the pipa’s incessant plucking.
Unsettled intonation from the sheng
made a poor comparison with the spotlessly
clean orchestral backdrop. Moreover, the range
and depth from the London Sinfonietta brought
only greater humility on the oriental instruments
whose capacity for expression appeared relatively
inferior.
Momentary success was to
be found in The Dance, whose savage
piano toccata nevertheless built into something
that bore a striking resemblance to fellow
folklorist and acknowledged inspiration Béla
Bartók’s Concerto for Orchestra.
But a return to the instrumental incongruity
and cheesy Western-oriental drama for concluding
Tears confirmed the worst: East lost
out to West.
There is also a hint of the
exotic in Messiaen’s Turangalîla
Symphony, but unlike The Song,
this composition fights one battle at a time:
love – and not a myriad of ethnicities and
physical complexities – begets the music.
Commissioned by composer, conductor and double
bassist Serge Koussevitzky for the Boston
Symphony Orchestra in the immediate aftermath
of WW2, Messiaen’s Tristan-inspired opus rests
his transcendental argument on the shoulders
of a modest orchestral force with solo piano
and ondes martenot.
Although requisite coughs
and splutters and then a mini-exodus after
Développement de l’amour would
have had us believe otherwise, Turangalîla
(literally translating from the Sanskrit
as: ‘the play of life and death in the passing
of time’) is a symphony in two five-movement
parts. The driving component in Messiaen’s
passing of time is sex and no amount of euphemisms
(i.e. ‘statue’ versus ‘flower’ themes, as
presented in the Introduction) can
camouflage the shameless orgiastic excess.
David Robertson conducts
this tide of languor and chaos to perfection:
the score, abundant in notes and sensations,
breathes unrestrained and yet ordered under
his confident baton. Robertson commands a
firm beat and elicits a massive spectrum of
sound that takes on all guises from the shrill
and unnerving to the tranquil.
Neither ondes nor piano suffer
the inconspicuous fate of Sheng’s soloists
– Messiaen was a master orchestrator and he
was famous for his prodigiously exacting ear
that could pick up the slightest mistake from
within densely packed musical textures. Pianist
Paul Crossley was brilliant in his role as
subversive interlocutor and devilish virtuoso,
and the eerie cries of the ondes rode high
above the orchestral pit, at times reinforcing
a particular melody and, at others, adding
an ornamental twist of the macabre. This extraordinary
mixture of deranged pianist, surreal ondes
and passionate orchestra came together for
an intoxicating grapple with the unfathomable.
Juxtapositions were negotiated
with ease, as in the Chant d’amour 1,
where crazed orchestral stamps alternate with
spooky ondes-delineated violins. In the midst
of the frantic mood and time shifts, the narrative
logic never failed to sound out eloquently
– through dense textures the music remained
lucid.
This concert offered up two
compositions whose physical components mixed
the old with the new: The Song and Dance
of Tears introduced the pipa and
the sheng; Turangalîla Symphony
gave us the ondes martenot. However an
integral point of difference, and one which
faulted the former and made a success of the
latter, is that of the driving aesthetic.
Sheng’s conception is motivated by an anthropological
duty and does not see the music for the physical
artefacts. Messiaen’s chef-d’oeuvre, on the
other hand, thinks in musical terms and embraces
universals that reign over and above temporal
considerations and inconsistencies. For this
reason, Turangalîla and not The
Song will stand the test of time and no
matter how great the performance, there is
nothing that can save Bright Sheng’s cultural
hodgepodge.
Aline
Nassif
Back to the Top Back to the Index Page |
| ||
|